<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Engage-Digital &#187; Visitor engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engage-digital.com/category/visitor-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engage-digital.com</link>
	<description>Website analysis and performance improvement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is this engagement&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.engage-digital.com/2008/02/04/is-this-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.engage-digital.com/2008/02/04/is-this-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitor engagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engage-digital.com/2008/02/04/is-this-engagement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I whole-heartedly agree that visitor engagement is a concept that needs to be considered as an aggregate of several elements covering both data and, crucially for me, context. I also think it is quite subjective.
I have recently done a piece of work for a client who put a new site redesign live at the beginning [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.engage-digital.com/2008/02/04/is-this-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
