Engage-Digital

E-D talks to Amanda Davie, MD of Boolian Ltd and member of the cScape Customer Engagement Unit

1. What is Bing?

Bing is the new name for Microsoft’s search engine. We’re talking largely about a re-brand (from Live Search previously). My guess is that Microsoft felt that a new brand was required – something that sounded more ‘funky’ and independent to the Microsoft the Live brands. Microsoft are going to be ploughing a lot of money into this new branding and consumer marketing to try and get Internet users to give Bing a try, because so far its search technology alone hasn’t managed to entice many people away from Google.

2. What’s so special about Bing?

What sits behind Bing in terms of its capabilities is the culmination of the last few years of Microsoft investing very heavily in their search product. But rather than trying to compete directly with Google in terms of ‘the Google formula’ Microsoft have sought to understand semantic search, search behaviour, and are trying to return the kinds of results that you would want for different kinds of vertical searches. Rather than have the same format and formula for every kind of result, as Google generally does. Microsoft is incorporating more answers in its search results. For example, search for “weather forecast London” on Bing, and you get the weather forecast for the next few days. I know that Google can do this kind of thing too, but Microsoft lay it out more nicely, using more imagery and icons. Some of the vertical search pillars that Microsoft have really focused on in terms of R&D, over the last few years, are image search, entertainment search, map search (through its acquisition of Multimap) and shopping search. So try some related searches to these verticals, and you might be pleasantly surprised!

3. And what about that left hand column listing related searches?

The related results on the left – again, Google do these too now, but Google put them at the bottom of the page. This is what we in the industry refer to as semantic search results i.e. trying to suggest common or relevant themes to the individual words or phrases that people might type in. Recognising that people don’t always say – or type – what they mean! For example, a search for “windows” could signify a need for a Microsoft product, a window cleaner or new double glazing.

4. Will the “related search” results present new challenges for SEO specialists?

I think it’s probably fair to say that most SEO specialists still tackle keyword/phrase targeting in the same way as they’ve done since the mid-90s – and it’s not particularly sophisticated. These techniques don’t yet necessarily allow for an in-depth understanding of semantic search language. But yes, it does present a big challenge because we (search and digital marketers) will need to get a lot closer to the behaviour and language of the searcher, and look beyond the keywords in terms of understanding what relevant themes we need to develop and optimise our web content around.

5. How do you think language pathways will help with SEO for the semantic web?

The Online Language Pathways (commissioned by CDA) research identifies that web users use different language during their search journeys – from their original language of intent, through their online search, to engaging with the websites that they choose to visit. We also tailor and filter our online language according to what we think will work best when searching, and also we adapt our language to the brand messaging that we see in the search results and again on the destination content. Understanding the semantics of search and indeed of the broader web has to be a key planning principle for search marketers moving forwards. It’s simply not enough to analyse keywords anymore; we have to understand the meaning behind the words – the language of intent.