<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Analytics, internal site search and SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engage-digital.com/2007/11/27/google-analytics-internal-site-search-and-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engage-digital.com/2007/11/27/google-analytics-internal-site-search-and-seo/</link>
	<description>Website analysis and performance improvement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.engage-digital.com/2007/11/27/google-analytics-internal-site-search-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-9598</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engage-digital.com/?p=34#comment-9598</guid>
		<description>This is a brilliant post! I too agree that the benefits of the intelligence that comes from having Site Search tracking running outweigh the benefits of the friendly URLs, even though I am an SEO practioner myself, having traffic is nice, but understanding the users intent is much more important.

One thing I might add though - I will be looking into the possibility of running a separate profile that has an advanced filter that is able to un-rewrite the URLs back into raw query string format, for digestion by that profiles Site Search tracking parser (not sure if its per profile or per site - might be out of luck if its per site, but then again, you could have it active for both profiles without issue... one would have the info and one wouldn&#039;t).

This way you&#039;d have one &quot;master&quot; profile with everything great except no Site Search tracking... and then you have your other &quot;Site Search Tracked&quot; profile with the advanced filters, but the URLs in Top Content won&#039;t quite be strictly correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a brilliant post! I too agree that the benefits of the intelligence that comes from having Site Search tracking running outweigh the benefits of the friendly URLs, even though I am an SEO practioner myself, having traffic is nice, but understanding the users intent is much more important.</p>
<p>One thing I might add though &#8211; I will be looking into the possibility of running a separate profile that has an advanced filter that is able to un-rewrite the URLs back into raw query string format, for digestion by that profiles Site Search tracking parser (not sure if its per profile or per site &#8211; might be out of luck if its per site, but then again, you could have it active for both profiles without issue&#8230; one would have the info and one wouldn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>This way you&#8217;d have one &#8220;master&#8221; profile with everything great except no Site Search tracking&#8230; and then you have your other &#8220;Site Search Tracked&#8221; profile with the advanced filters, but the URLs in Top Content won&#8217;t quite be strictly correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

